Does your child actually need a tutor? A five-question test
A decision framework for parents in the 'everyone else is tutoring' postcode. Tutoring works when there's a specific, nameable gap and the child experiences it as help. It backfires when it becomes another thing being done to them.
Tutoring works when there is a specific, nameable gap and the child experiences the sessions as help rather than punishment. It's a strong tool for a targeted problem. It's a weak tool for 'we should probably be doing something because everyone else is'. Before booking anything, work through the five questions below — the honest answers usually tell you what to do.
Question 1: is there a specific, nameable gap?
'He's behind' is not the same as 'he cannot yet do long division and it's affecting his confidence in maths generally'. The first is a feeling. The second is a workable brief for a tutor.
If you can name the gap in one sentence — including which topic, which type of question, and how you know — a targeted six-to-twelve-week block with a tutor who knows that content is likely to help. If you can't, spend a week finding out (talk to the teacher, do a diagnostic) before booking anything.
Question 2: has the school actually been asked?
State schools are legally required to identify and support pupils who are falling behind. Independent schools are usually equally responsive when parents raise a specific concern. A short, focused conversation with the class teacher — 'where exactly is my child struggling, and what is the school already doing?' — often reveals that the gap is smaller than it feels, or that a targeted intervention is already in place.
This is worth doing even if you're heading toward tutoring anyway. The teacher's answer tells you what the tutor should focus on, and whether the tutor's approach will complement or contradict the school's.
Question 3: is this about the exam, or about the subject?
Tutoring for a specific exam (11+ past papers, GCSE technique, an entrance-test format) is a different service from tutoring to build genuine understanding of a subject. Both are legitimate, but they're not interchangeable — and a tutor who's excellent at one may be mediocre at the other.
If your child understands the maths but keeps running out of time, you want a tutor who can teach pace and technique. If they don't yet get long division, no amount of past-paper drilling will fix that. Match the tutor to the actual problem.
Question 4: would your child enjoy it, or just tolerate it?
Children who find tutoring calm and confidence-building tend to benefit. Children who experience it as one more thing being done to them, on top of an already long school day, often show little gain and rising resentment. This matters more than most prep guides admit.
One useful check after two or three sessions with a new tutor: does your child come out of the session more or less confident? Do they mention what they did in the session unprompted, or only when asked? If the answers are 'less' and 'only when asked', the fit is probably wrong — not necessarily the tutor's fault, but a signal to try a different pace, style, or person.
Question 5: what happens if you say no?
If the honest answer is 'nothing much' — your child is coping, progressing, engaging with school, and not distressed — that's useful information. Tutoring is not a default setting for competent parenting; it's a response to a specific, named problem.
If the answer is 'they'll fall further behind and it'll compound', you have a specific reason. Book. If the answer is 'they'll be fine but I'll worry more', the tutoring is arguably solving your anxiety rather than their gap — which is worth naming honestly, because there are cheaper ways to address parental worry.
When the honest answer is 'yes, we need a tutor'
If the five questions above land you at 'yes': keep it targeted, keep it short. The strongest evidence in the EEF Toolkit and the Sutton Trust's work is for structured one-to-one or small-group tuition tied to a specific outcome — usually 6-12 weeks, one session per week, with visible weekly progress on the identified gap.
Open-ended 'let's just keep going with the tutor indefinitely' rarely produces gains proportional to cost. Tie the engagement to a specific goal (fix long division, master short-answer comprehension technique, get comfortable with GL-format non-verbal reasoning), and re-evaluate every 6-8 weeks whether progress is happening and whether the goal has been reached.
Frequently asked questions
Everyone in our year group has a tutor — is my child at a disadvantage without one?
Only if 'everyone' is genuinely coping and your child isn't, in which case you have a specific gap to address (see Question 1). If 'everyone' is just anxious parents copying each other, the disadvantage is imaginary — but the money is real.
How do we find a good tutor?
Personal recommendation from another parent whose child has a similar profile to yours is the most reliable signal. Formal qualifications matter less than demonstrated results and rapport. Meet the tutor before booking a block; ask how they'd diagnose your child's gap in the first session and what progress they'd expect in the first month.
Is one-to-one always better than group tutoring?
Not automatically. Small-group tuition (2-6 children matched in level) often delivers similar attainment gains to one-to-one at a lower cost per family. What matters is whether the group is genuinely matched — not whether the format is one-to-one.
How long should we keep going with a tutor?
Set a specific outcome and a specific time limit at the start (e.g. 'fix long division and division word problems by end of half-term'). Review at the end of that window. If the outcome is reached, stop or pause. If it isn't, ask why — and consider whether the tutor is the right fit for this child before extending.
Should tutoring feel like fun?
Not necessarily fun, but not miserable. Productive tutoring usually feels a bit stretching and a bit satisfying to the child — they finish sessions with more confidence than they started, even if the content was hard. Persistent misery after multiple sessions with a competent tutor usually means the format or intensity isn't right for this child.
This piece is a decision framework for the general case. It can't tell you whether your specific child needs a tutor — that depends on the answers to the five questions applied to your specific child's situation, current gaps, and how they typically respond to help. Deep Teaching's assessment tools are built for exactly that next step.
Evidence level
The framework draws on the Sutton Trust 2026 tutoring evidence base and the Education Endowment Foundation's Teaching and Learning Toolkit — both on the LS34 whitelist. Deep Teaching's own diagnostic data adds the pace-pattern angle.
References
- Sutton Trust. (2026). Private Tutoring 2026 ↗ external. suttontrust.com
- Education Endowment Foundation. (2024). Teaching and Learning Toolkit: One-to-one tuition ↗ external. EEF Teaching and Learning Toolkit
Is it worth getting a tutor for the 11+? A data-based answer, not a guilt trip
Private tutoring has grown fast in England and Wales — 29% of secondary pupils have had it at some point, 45% in London — but that figure includes children being tutored for very different reasons. This piece walks through five questions to answer before booking a tutor for the 11+.
When should we start preparing for the 11+?
Most families who use structured 11+ preparation begin in Year 4 or the summer between Year 4 and Year 5. Earlier is usually not more effective; later than mid-Year 5 requires a tighter, more focused approach. What matters more than start date is how the time is used.
How can I tell if my child is 11+ ready? What 1,654 real diagnostics reveal
Across 1,654 diagnostics and 37,556 scored answers from 1,263 families, wrong answers come in almost exactly twice as fast as right ones. Slowing down is a teachable skill worth real marks — and it's one of the clearest early signals a child isn't yet 11+-ready even when their totals look fine.